|
Hospitality Management's Academic Learning Compacts. |
||
|
Degree Program Student Learning Outcomes |
Direct Assessment Measures |
Data Collection and Analysis Plan |
|
Content/Discipline Knowledge |
See examples below this matrix |
(Who Collects? Who Analyzes? When?) |
|
1.
Demonstrate proficiency in federal employment |
1. The faculty
will use quizzes with appropriately |
The School
of Hospitality and Tourism Manage- |
|
law and
its impact on human resources |
designed
questions to assess proficiency. |
ment
has established a very thorough process |
|
management
policies and practices in the |
2. The
faculty will use quizzes to assess |
with
specific, detailed, written procedures that |
|
hospitality industry. |
proficiency in information
technology. |
are
followed to complete the Academic Learn- |
|
2.
Demonstrate proficiency in accounting, finance |
|
ing Compacts for this degree. |
|
and
information systems management |
3. The faculty
will use embedded questions in |
Each
faculty member teaching a core course |
|
as
they are applied in the hospitality industry. |
examinations to assess proficiency. |
is
responsible for data collection and analysis |
|
3.
Demonstrate proficiency in marketing, |
4. The faculty
will use written Menu Planning and |
as it
relates to the Student Learning Outcomes |
|
management
and human resources support |
Evaluation
sheets to assess proficiency in the |
and Direct
Assessment Procedures for each core |
|
services
as they are applied in the hospitality |
foodservice laboratories. |
course they teach. |
|
industry. |
|
|
|
4.
Demonstrate a general knowledge of food |
|
At the
beginning of each three semester reporting |
|
production
techniques and skills in producing |
|
period
Student Learning Outcomes and Direct |
|
and
managing food functions in lodging |
|
Assessment
Procedures are determined by the |
|
and
foodservice industries. |
|
Lead
Professor in conjunction with all faculty |
|
Critical Thinking |
|
members
teaching sections of the same course |
|
1. Analyze
problems generally found in the |
1. The
faculty will use embedded questions on |
for
the upcoming reporting year. The new |
|
hospitality
field using quantitative and qualitative |
midterm and
final examinations to assess |
assessment
measures are then uploaded to the |
|
reasoning. |
critical thinking skills. |
School’s
Student Learning Outcome (SLO) web site. |
|
2.
Recognize and solve problems generally |
|
|
|
found in the
hospitality field using quantitative |
|
At the end
of each semester all professors upload |
|
and
qualitative reasoning. |
|
their section’s results to the School’s SLO web site. |
|
3. Apply
analytical tools to solve financial and |
|
|
|
managerial
accounting problems encountered |
|
An
analysis of those data is conducted by |
|
in
the hospitality industry. |
|
the Lead
Professor in conjunction with all |
|
Oral and Written Communication |
|
faculty members
teaching sections of the course for |
|
1.
Demonstrate the ability to review and |
1. The faculty
will use a scoring rubric to assess |
that
reporting year. Improvements based
upon |
|
summarize
research findings from the hospitality |
content knowledge
and elocution during oral |
this
analysis are determined and incorporated |
|
literature. |
presentations. |
into the
core course for the next reporting |
|
2.
Demonstrate the ability to thoroughly respond |
2. The faculty will
use a scoring rubric to assess |
year, and,
if required, changes are made to the |
|
to
contemporary hospitality management issues |
organization
and visual materials during oral |
next
reporting year’s assessment plans. |
|
found in the hospitality industry. |
presentations. |
|
|
3.
Demonstrate the ability to effectively |
3. The faculty
will use a scoring rubric to assess |
These
procedures are distributed to all School |
|
summarize
key points and communicate them |
content quality
and usefulness of ideas of |
of
Hospitality and Tourism Management faculty |
|
effectively
through oral presentations on |
research papers. |
members
and training sessions are provided to |
|
contemporary hospitality management issues. |
4. The faculty
will use a scoring rubric to assess |
assist
with data collection and analysis as well as |
|
4.
Demonstrate the ability to effectively present |
thoroughness
and specificity of content of |
other stages of the ALC process.
All ALC data |
|
information
on contemporary hospitality |
research papers. |
is
preserved on the School’s SLO web site and is |
|
management
issues in a logical, interesting |
|
transmitted
to the office of Institutional Effectiveness |
|
sequence with relevant visual material. |
|
in
the form of reports based on their requirements. |
Example of Quiz Used to Assess
Knowledge Proficiency:
HFT 4464 - Financial Analysis in the Hospitality
Industry
Answer all three questions in the space provided.
Please show your work as partial credit may be given.
Question 1
a. Paulette’s Clutter has sales of $67,300. The costs of
goods sold are $41,000 and the other costs are $13,000. Depreciation is $8,500
and the tax rate is 34%. What is the net income of the firm?
b. Explain the importance of managing short term assets
(current assets) and short term liabilities (current liabilities) for a small
restaurant business.
Question 2
|
Cost of Food Sold |
$360,500 |
Net Income |
$104,050 |
|
Current Assets |
$107,750 |
Total Assets |
$456,000 |
|
Current Liabilities |
$111,750 |
Total Equity |
$143,750 |
|
Food Sales |
$1,030,000 |
Total Long-term Liabilities |
$200,500 |
Mahoney’s
Irish Restaurant Financial Information is shown below:
A-
Compute the following ratios
(i) current ratio.
(ii) food cost percentage.
(iii) return on assets.
B- Given the following industry averages, comment on Mahoney’s financial performance
|
Ratios |
Industry Averages |
|
Current Ratio |
1.84 |
|
Food cost percentage |
33.5% |
|
Return on Assets |
4.6% |
Question 3
Dorian Industries’
projected sales for the first six months of 2004 are given below.
|
Jan |
$200,000 |
April |
$400,000 |
|
Feb |
$240,000 |
May |
$320,000 |
|
March |
$280,000 |
June |
$320,000 |
25% of sales is collected in cash at the time of the sale, 50% is
collected in the month following the sale, and the remaining 25% is collected
in the second month following the sale.
Cost of goods sold is 75% of sales.
Purchases are made in the month prior to the sale, and payments for
purchases are made in the month of sale.
That is, purchases April’s sales are made in March and paid
for in April. Total other cash expenses
are $60,000 per month. The company’s
cash balance as of February 28 will be $40,000.
The company must maintain a minimum cash balance of $25,000 at the
beginning of each month.
a. What are Dorian’s total cash receipts for March & April.
b. What are Dorian’s total cash disbursements for March
& April.
c. What is Dorian’s ending cash balance in March?
d. Dorian is expected to make a tax payment of $20,000 in
March. Will it be able to do so? What advise can you give to Dorian?
Example of Critical Thinking Embedded
Questions:
HFT 4474

Example of Oral Presentation
Evaluation Rubric:
Oral Presentation Rubric-HFT 4221
Student
Name:___________________ Topic:_____________________
Date:____________
|
|
|
|
Criteria |
|
|
Points |
|
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Appearance/ Professionalism |
Dress and appearance completely in character for
a professional presentation. |
Dress and appearance
almost in character for a professional presentation. |
Attempt made in dress and appearance for a
presentation. |
Dress and appearance no different than what
student would wear to class. |
No attempt was made in dress and appearance for
presentation. |
|
|
Organization/ Visuals |
Student presents information in
logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow; outstanding
visuals that reinforce information. |
Student presents information in
logical sequence which audience can follow; well done visuals
that frequently relate to presentation. |
Student jumps around during presentation making
it difficult for audience to follow; visuals
cannot be seen clearly. |
Student presents very little information; poorly developed visuals that rarely relate to
information and is too detailed. |
Student presents
information that cannot be understood; there is no sequence of information or
visuals. |
|
|
Content Knowledge |
Student demonstrates full knowledge (new,
innovative) of the topic; able to discuss easily with
audience and answers all class questions with explanations. |
Student demonstrates full knowledge of the topic;
is able to discuss with audience; answers all class questions, but fails to
elaborate. |
Student demonstrates knowledge of topic; is able
to talk about it with the audience; answers most class questions. |
Student does not present information much outside
of the textbook; barely able to answer questions. |
Student does not have a grasp of subject matter;
cannot answer questions correctly. |
|
|
Preparedness/ Eye Contact |
Student well prepared; presentation rehearsed;
holds complete attention of audience; maintains eye contact; does not need
notes; does not read but presents. |
Student adequately prepared; presentation
rehearsed; holds attention of audience most of time; maintains eye contact;
seldom refers to notes; reads very little.
|
Student prepared: presentation somewhat
rehearsed; attention of audience held about half the time; maintains
eye contact half the time; refers to notes half the time; reads at
times. |
Student barely prepared; presentation not
rehearsed; occasional eye contact; reads most the report;
reads much of the time |
Student not prepared; presentationnot
rehearsed; read entire presentation from paper or notes; not have attention
of audience; no eye contact; could not present without notes. |
|
|
Elocution/ Clarity |
Student uses a clear voice and is very
articulate; projects voice so that all audience members can hear; adheres to
timeframe. |
Student uses a clear voice with satisfactory use
of inflection; majority of audience members can hear; adheres to
timeframe. |
Student uses
voice with only some level of inflection throughout delivery; half the
audience has difficulty hearing; goes over the timeframe. |
Student uses a constant monotone voice; many
audience members cannot hear; well over timeframe. |
Student mumbles; speaks so quietly that members
of audience in back cannot hear; no adherence to timeframe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total→ |
/25 |
|
Creativity |
Presentation is one of a kind and will be
remembered long after. |
Presentation is very innovative. |
Attempt was made at some creativity in
presentation |
|
|
|
Example of Written Communication
Evaluation Rubric:
EVALUATION OF THE PAPER WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING:
|
Qualities & Criteria |
Low |
Middle |
High |
|
Point Value |
0 to 1 |
2 to 3 |
4 to 5 |
|
Writing Skills: The student's work reflects the ability to: Effectively transmit written data to others
by addressing the following areas: 1. Content Development ·
Problem
statement is identified ·
Key elements are
established ·
Major points are
clearly stated |
Little to no evidence of content
development. Problem statement is not identified. No statements of major
points or key elements. |
Areas of content development
are provided but context and purpose of writing is unclear. |
Problem statement is
appropriately identified. Engages the reader with a clear overview of issues
to be discussed in a clear and concise manner. |
|
2. Organization ·
Content is
comprehensive, accurate, and substantive ·
Paragraphs and
ideas transition logically ·
Sentence and paragraph
structure is clear and concise. ·
Relevant
literature is integrated throughout paper ·
Conclusion
reviews major points |
Lack of evidence relating to
organization of thought. Structure of paper is disconnected with no logical
flow of ideas. Little to no use of relevant literature to topic. No
concluding paragraph. |
Content is organized but
lacks some clarity and accuracy. Flow of paper is basic but some disconnect
between ideas. Minimal use of relevant literature. Conclusion lacks ability
to draw together major points of paper. |
Material is well organized,
comprehensive, accurate, and substantive. Logical order to ideas and natural
transition of paragraphs. Strong conclusion to paper. |
|
3. Format ·
APA style
utilized throughout paper ·
Correct use of references
and in-text citations ·
Correct grammar,
spelling and punctuation |
Poor to no use of correct
APA format. Improper use of in-text citation and reference page. Many errors
in spelling, grammar and improper punctuation. Writing is difficult to understand
due to grammatical errors. |
Inconsistent use of proper
APA format. Minimal errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Some errors in sentence
structure and paragraphing. |
Consistent use of proper use
of APA format. Few, if any, errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation,
sentence structure, and paragraphing. |
|
Use the work of others appropriately through utilization of: ·
High quality
resources, including current practice guidelines, if appropriate. ·
Diverse resources,
including current research-based journal articles. ·
Primary
resources for the majority of citations. ·
Paraphrasing for
the majority of resources. |
Minimal to no use of quality
resources. Frequent use of quotes. Lack of or incorrect formatting of reference
page and in-text citations.
Insufficient number of references. |
Evidence of some use of
quality resources. Adequate paraphrasing but some quote usage. Inconsistent
citing of appropriate sources. |
Quality, diverse resources
used as primary sources of information. The in-text citations match the
reference page and are properly formatted. Paraphrasing used for majority of
resources |
|
Computer/Technology Skills: The student's work reflects the ability
to: Utilize a word processing program for written work. |
Inability to provide a paper
written in a word processing program or one with multiple formatting errors. |
Ability to provide paper in
a word processing program. Some formatting errors. |
Paper is professionally
presented in a word processing format with minimal to no errors. |
|
Access/use information retrieval data bases/internet sites by: ·
Evaluating the
quality of resources. ·
Integrating
resources references into
written work. |
No evidence of correctly
accessing internet/database sites for retrieving information related to paper
topic. Site addresses unavailable for confirmation |
Evidence of accessing internet/database
information but resources is poor to average in quality. Some formatting
errors for in-text and reference page citations of sites. |
Advanced skill in accessing
quality internet/database sites. Resources are utilized in written work in correct
format. |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
_______/30 points |
|
COMMENTS |
|
|
|
FSS 3230 Menu Planning Evaluation Worksheet
Management Team Members: Date______
Name Position
1.________________________________________ ______________________
2.________________________________________ ______________________
3.________________________________________ ______________________
4.________________________________________ ______________________
5.________________________________________ ______________________
6.________________________________________ ______________________
First Course
__________________________________________________________
Main
Course 1:_________________________________________________________
Starch_________________________________________________________________
Vegetables_____________________________________________________________
Sauce_________________________________________________________________
Main
Course 2:__________________________________________________________
Starch_________________________________________________________________
Vegetables_____________________________________________________________
Sauce_________________________________________________________________
Dessert________________________________________________________________
Comments:
Starting
Time:________
Presentation
Time_____
|
Course |
Color |
Texture |
Flavor |
Temperature |
|
First Course |
|
|
|
|
|
Main Course 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Starch |
|
|
|
|
|
Vegetables |
|
|
|
|
|
Sauce |
|
|
|
|
|
Main Course 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Starch |
|
|
|
|
|
Vegetables |
|
|
|
|
|
Sauce |
|
|
|
|
|
Dessert |
|
|
|
|
Points
per Item: 2.5 Total for group: _______________